From: "Vanilla Gorilla" Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Cologne Fair Briefs Date: 15 Nov 1997 23:15:16 -0600 Organization: TEAM AMIGA - CONVERGENCE INTERNATIONAL Lines: 54 Message-ID: <64lvn1$32d$1@newserve.gulftel.com> References: groups/comp.sys.amiga.misc/95557.head <1328.259T1050T1861242@algonet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: 145.ppp6.gulftel.com X-Newsreader: FFNews 1.63 (Amiga;32bit) *Unregistered* Path: 195.95.96.10!news.unisource.be!News.Amsterdam.UnisourceCS!ubnnews.unisource.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!news-ge.switch.ch!news-fra1.dfn.de!Cabal.CESspool!bofh.vszbr.cz!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.communique.net!communique!gulftel!not-for-mail On 16 Nov 1997 03:06:21 Magnus Pettersson wrote about "Re: Cologne Fair Briefs": > > Joachim Sondermann-Bieker wrote: (15-Nov-97 22:03:55) > > >Tyschtschenko made a pretty surprising statement: He would like most a > >Motorola 68060 or 68080 at 200 Mhz in a new Amiga. > > Ehh... Say What!? > If this is the the way Amiga is going I'm afraid there's not much > hope left for all of us! AI could just as easily put the old 68070 > in the "new" machine and flush it down the toilet. It would produce > exactly the same results - nada, zero, nothing! Hello Mr. Tyschtschenko > WAKE UP! It's just a few years left to the big "2000", we want new > powerful machines. What's so dreadfully wrong with PPC? > > I'm *very* tired right now and don't intend to start some kind of > flame war! Just had to comment Mr. Tyschtschenko's vague > statement, I hope that he was quite tired too... :/ > > Cheers, > > Magnus This is what the report said: There is no decision yet which CPU shall be used in the new Amiga line.Tyschtschenko made a pretty surprising statement: He would like most a Motorola 68060 or 68080 at 200 MHz in a new Amiga. He pointed out the advantage of being able to use a simple OS upgrade from 3.x instead of a complete rewrite. He didn't elaborate whether Motorola would be willing to build such a beast. Another option, processor-wise, would be some sort of cooperation with Phase5 (and the PPC board). This does not make much sense to me! It's going to be easier to have a simple OS upgrade that to rewrite it for a new chip??? A chip that does not exist to my knowledge. This completely dumbfounded me and is almost unbelievable! If this is not the case then they are going to use an old slow (by todays standards) like the 68060..which I don't think is even being produced anymore! HOW is it going to be easier for Motorola to gear back up and produce a chip that they abandoned a couple of years ago than to rewrite the OS for a newer more powerful chip! PLEASE tell me this isn't correct. This could not possibly be true! I've wept for hours! :(